MMIS Service Agreement Issue

04-23-19

MMIS Service Agreement Issue

Could you please forward this email string along to the MCHSSA group for insight to what other counties are doing with this? 

It’s a concern to our Social Services Supervisor and myself that we are being directed to authorize large amounts in Service Agreements that the provider COULD use anytime within the date span of the SA (this is for CCDTF, Care Coordination and Peer Support Services) 

i.e. We have a service agreement with a provider to provide services 10 days/month for 4 months.  MMIS is not allowing us to only authorize 10 days (8 units per day=80 units/month) for the service agreement span.  We are being directed by DHS to authorize every day in the 4 month span at 8 units per day.  This allows the provider to bill up to that amount, which far exceeds the amount actually authorized.

Is anyone else noticing this as a problem in their county?  How are you tracking so the provider doesn’t take advantage of this?

Thanks!
Fiscal Supervisor/Collections Officer
Aitkin County Health & Human Services
Phone (218) 927-7200

Initial response to Aitkin County from DHS:
Counties should authorize the date span in which the services COULD be used.  They may only use requested units of the total that was authorized but use those units at varying times within the date span.

Aitkin County internal e-mails:
1. What she came back with, does not address the problem of authorizing big money!
2. So if I am understanding this correctly, she is now directing us to just authorize all of it?
3. Yes, that is what I am understanding too. I wonder if whomever she has talked to understands the concern. Is there anyone else we can appeal to?

Aitkin County e-mail sent to state regarding the prior response:
Thank you for your prompt response. Just so I am understanding DHS’s direction then, you are indicating that counties authorize the 8 units per day per service, if it is being requested, for the entire date span of the service agreement, encumbering large amounts of dollars, to provide the provider access to bill when they provide the service?

This does not address the large amount of dollars being encumbered but we will do this if this is what DHS is directing counties to do.

DHS final response:
Correct! If you like, you can also inform the provider of units per day for tx coord and peer support so they can request units appropriately as well.



TCM for ICPC Children


04-23-19
How do you handle charges and target case management for ICPC children?  When they do not have MA for Minnesota and do not qualify for IV-E?  But are on for instance BagerCare in Wisconsin or another form of assistance in another state?

Gwen Resech
SOCIAL SERVICES FISCAL SUPERVISOR
WABASHA COUNTY

Cost Allocation Plan input for conference

04-08-19



I’m working with Angela Pond from Government Management Group on a Cost Allocation Plan presentation for conference. What questions do you have regarding Cost Allocation plans? This is the time to get your questions answered. The more input we can give on the information needed, the more you will get out of the presentation!

Thank you!


Emily Ehnes
Fiscal Supervisor
Sherburne County Health & Human Services
phone 763-765-4025  fax 763-765-4096